ChatGPT prompts for SEO blog writing

Write an SEO blog article targeting [PRIMARY KEYWORD] for [AUDIENCE]. The reader’s likely search intent and the action we want the article to support are [SEARCH INTENT AND GOAL]. Use these approved facts, examples, sources, and product details only: [SOURCE MATERIAL]. Competing pages or content gaps to address are [CONTENT GAP OR COMPETITOR NOTES].

First, infer the dominant intent: informational, commercial investigation, transactional, or mixed. Build the article around the reader’s actual task, not a fixed keyword density. Put the direct answer or useful framing near the top, then develop the topic with concrete steps, criteria, examples, tradeoffs, and limitations appropriate to the query.

Produce:
1. An SEO title tag under 60 characters and meta description between 140 and 155 characters.
2. A detailed outline with one H1 and logical H2/H3 sections, including an FAQ only if it answers distinct high-intent questions.
3. A 1,200–1,600-word draft in plain language.
4. A short list of natural internal-link anchor-text opportunities using [INTERNAL PAGES], if supplied.
5. A final on-page checklist: intent coverage, claims needing a citation, thin sections, and places where the keyword feels forced.

Use the primary keyword naturally in the title, introduction, and at least one relevant subheading only when it reads naturally. Use related terms when they clarify meaning, not as a keyword list. Never invent statistics, customer stories, expert quotes, rankings, or source citations. Do not make legal, medical, or financial claims without appropriate approved support.

Before answering, verify that every factual claim is supported by the source material or marked for citation. Also check that the article gives a reader a useful answer even if they never buy from us. Ask up to 3 clarifying questions only if a required input is missing.

Create an SEO content brief for [KEYWORD] aimed at [AUDIENCE]. The intended search outcome is [INTENT]. Review these notes on current results and gaps: [SERP NOTES]. Produce a recommended angle, search-intent rationale, outline, questions to answer, original-evidence requirements, claims requiring sources, and internal-link ideas from [SITE PAGES]. Do not promise rankings or invent competitor details. Before answering, check that each section earns its place by helping the searcher complete the task.

Improve this existing article: [CURRENT DRAFT]. It targets [KEYWORD] for [AUDIENCE]. Use these approved updates and sources: [NEW EVIDENCE]. Return a revision plan, then a revised draft with changed sections clearly identified. Preserve accurate material, remove unsupported claims, and add only content that better serves the likely intent. Do not invent new data or citations. Check that the title, opening, headings, and conclusion align with the same search task.

Draft a balanced comparison article for [AUDIENCE] evaluating [OPTION A] and [OPTION B] for [USE CASE]. Use only [VERIFIED FACTS]. Include a quick comparison table, criteria that matter, strengths and limitations of each option, who should choose each, and a conclusion. Do not make unverified pricing, integration, security, or performance claims. Avoid declaring a universal winner. Before answering, flag comparison fields without evidence and ensure the recommendation depends on stated needs.