Prompts / Operations & Project Management

ChatGPT prompts for risk assessment

This prompt produces a practical risk register and response plan rather than a generic list of dangers. Use it at project kickoff, before a major change, or when a team needs clear risk ownership.

PromptOpen ChatGPTOpen Claude
Create a risk assessment for [PROJECT OR OPERATION] over [TIME HORIZON]. The objective, scope, and success criteria are [OBJECTIVE AND SCOPE]. The work plan, systems, people, vendors, and dependencies are [WORK AND DEPENDENCIES]. Known incidents, concerns, controls, and constraints are [KNOWN RISKS AND CONTROLS]. Our risk tolerance and escalation rules are [RISK TOLERANCE].

Use only the supplied facts. Identify risks across delivery, operational, financial, legal or compliance, security or privacy, safety, vendor, reputation, and people categories only where relevant. Do not present a risk as a certainty. Write each risk in cause–event–impact form: “Because [cause], [event] may occur, resulting in [impact].” Distinguish root causes from consequences and avoid duplicating the same exposure under several names.

Produce:
1. A risk register table with ID, category, cause–event–impact statement, affected objective, existing controls, likelihood (1–5), impact (1–5), inherent score, owner, leading indicator or trigger, response, target date, and residual score.
2. A prioritized top-five narrative that explains why each risk is ranked where it is.
3. A response plan separating avoid, reduce, transfer, accept, and contingency actions. For accepted risks, state the decision owner and monitoring cadence.
4. A weekly risk-review agenda and escalation thresholds for risks that change.

Use relative scoring only as a decision aid; do not make legal, security, safety, or insurance determinations. Flag items that require review by a qualified professional or policy owner.

Before answering, check that every high-scoring risk has one accountable owner, a dated response, and a measurable trigger. Also check that controls are not confused with future actions. Ask up to 3 clarifying questions only if a required input is missing.

Fill in

PlaceholderWhat to enterExample
[PROJECT OR OPERATION]Name the project, process, launch, or operation being assessed.Migration of the customer billing portal to a new payment provider
[TIME HORIZON]Enter the dates or period during which the risks matter.Planning through launch on November 15 and the first 30 days after launch
[OBJECTIVE AND SCOPE]Describe the intended outcome, boundaries, and measures of success.Move active subscriptions without missed charges or customer exposure; success is 99.5% migration completion and no critical payment outage.
[WORK AND DEPENDENCIES]List major workstreams, systems, vendors, decisions, and handoffs.Engineering builds integration; finance reconciles payouts; vendor supplies token migration; support updates customer notices; legal approves data processing terms.
[KNOWN RISKS AND CONTROLS]Provide known concerns, prior incidents, existing safeguards, and constraints.A prior sandbox import duplicated test subscriptions; daily backups exist; vendor migration documentation is incomplete.
[RISK TOLERANCE]State unacceptable impacts, approval thresholds, and escalation rules.No unencrypted payment data, no production cutover without finance sign-off, and any outage over 30 minutes goes to the incident commander.

How to use

  1. Paste the prompt with project facts, including controls already in place and decision thresholds.
  2. Have the people who own systems, vendors, and operations validate the cause–event–impact wording.
  3. Review high risks first and assign one accountable owner, a due date, and a trigger before treating the register as complete.
  4. Follow up with: “Convert the top five responses into an action tracker with dependencies and a status field for our Monday review.”

Variations

Vendor assessment

Use this before onboarding or renewing a critical vendor.

Variation
Assess risks of using [VENDOR] for [SERVICE]. The vendor’s role and data access are [ROLE AND DATA], contractual terms known so far are [TERMS], internal dependencies are [DEPENDENCIES], and our requirements are [REQUIREMENTS]. Produce a vendor risk register covering continuity, information security, privacy, subcontractors, financial exposure, support, and exit planning where applicable. State evidence needed for each unverified item, an owner, and a decision threshold. Do not claim the vendor has a certification or control without evidence. Check that high risks have a mitigation or explicit acceptance owner. Ask up to 3 questions only if inputs are missing.

Event safety review

Use this to organize a safety review for an event; use qualified professionals for formal safety decisions.

Variation
Prepare a preliminary risk register for [EVENT] at [VENUE] on [DATE]. Expected attendance, audience, and activities are [EVENT DETAILS]; venue information and existing plans are [VENUE CONTROLS]; known hazards and requirements are [HAZARDS AND RULES]. Cover crowd flow, medical response, weather, accessibility, safeguarding, food, transport, equipment, and emergency communications where relevant. Return hazards, existing controls, missing information, response owners, and escalation triggers. This is planning support, not a substitute for venue, medical, fire, or security professionals. Check that each critical item has an assigned professional review path. Ask up to 3 questions only if inputs are missing.

Change risk review

Use this before releasing a material process or system change.

Variation
Assess the operational risk of changing [CURRENT PROCESS] to [PROPOSED CHANGE] on [IMPLEMENTATION DATE]. Users affected are [AFFECTED USERS], rollout and rollback details are [ROLLOUT PLAN], and known controls are [CONTROLS]. Produce a before-and-after risk table, failure modes, leading indicators, rollback triggers, communications owners, and a go/no-go checklist. Separate technical verification from business readiness. Do not assume testing proves every real-world outcome. Check that each rollback trigger is measurable and that the plan names who can authorize rollback. Ask up to 3 questions only if required inputs are missing.

Tips

  • Write risks as uncertain cause–event–impact chains; this makes it possible to choose a control that addresses the cause or limits the impact.
  • Give one person accountability for each response, even when several teams contribute; a shared owner is often an unowned item.
  • A risk score without a trigger is hard to monitor, so attach an observable signal such as error rate, missed milestone, vendor response time, or cash variance.
  • Keep existing controls separate from planned remediation so leaders can see the residual exposure if a future action slips.

FAQ

Is a risk register enough for a compliance or security assessment?

No. It can organize evidence and decisions, but regulated, security, safety, legal, and insurance matters need the appropriate qualified review.

How should we score likelihood and impact?

Define the 1–5 scales before scoring and use them consistently. The relative ranking is more useful than false precision in a multiplication result.

Who should own a risk?

Assign the person accountable for ensuring the response happens or is formally accepted, not necessarily every person who performs an action.

Related prompts

All Operations & Project Management prompts →

Get a few prompts like this every week

Something Big is a free AI newsletter read by 70,000+ professionals. About three short emails a week with prompts and tools that work, plus what changed in AI and what to do about it.