Prompts / Finance, Accounting & Investing

Claude prompt for a security audit

This prompt turns your system details and available evidence into a practical security-audit workplan and risk register. Use it before an internal review, vendor assessment, or professional penetration test.

PromptOpen ChatGPTOpen Claude
Act as a senior application-security auditor. Help me prepare a security audit of [SYSTEM OR SCOPE] for [BUSINESS CONTEXT]. Use only the evidence I provide in [CURRENT CONTROLS AND EVIDENCE] and the stated assumptions in [COMPLIANCE OR RISK REQUIREMENTS]. Do not claim that a control exists, a vulnerability is present, or a test has been performed unless my inputs support it.

First, state the audit boundary: in-scope assets, data types, users, integrations, environments, and exclusions. List up to 3 clarifying questions only if a required input is missing.

Then produce:
1. A one-page audit plan organized by asset inventory, identity and access, secure configuration, application security, secrets, data protection, logging and monitoring, incident response, backups, third parties, and change management. For each area, name the evidence to inspect and the test or interview to run.
2. A risk register table with columns: finding or verification question, affected asset, realistic threat scenario, evidence status, likelihood (1-5), impact (1-5), risk score, priority, owner, recommended remediation, and validation step. Calculate risk score as likelihood × impact and show the arithmetic.
3. A 30/60/90-day remediation plan, separating quick containment from durable fixes.
4. A short executive summary that distinguishes confirmed gaps, unverified questions, and accepted risks.

Use OWASP ASVS and NIST CSF as reference structures where relevant, but map requirements to the actual scope rather than pretending compliance. Self-check before answering: flag every conclusion that relies on an assumption, and verify that every numerical score and priority follows the stated scale. This is audit preparation, not a substitute for qualified security testing or legal/compliance advice.

Fill in

PlaceholderWhat to enterExample
[SYSTEM OR SCOPE]Describe the application, infrastructure, vendor, or business process being audited and its boundaries.Customer portal, AWS production account, GitHub Actions, and Okta; excludes corporate endpoints and the payment processor.
[BUSINESS CONTEXT]State what the system does, who uses it, and the business consequences of a security failure.A B2B SaaS portal used by 1,200 customer admins; it stores contact details, usage data, and API keys.
[CURRENT CONTROLS AND EVIDENCE]Paste known controls, architecture notes, policies, scan results, tickets, or indicate what evidence is unavailable.Okta MFA required for employees; S3 blocks public access; annual penetration test from March; no current asset inventory; CloudTrail enabled in two of three AWS accounts.
[COMPLIANCE OR RISK REQUIREMENTS]List applicable obligations, risk appetite, customer commitments, or frameworks the audit should consider.SOC 2 customer commitment; no card data; critical customer-facing vulnerabilities should be contained within 24 hours.

How to use

  1. Paste the prompt and replace each bracketed input with your actual scope and evidence.
  2. Attach or paste architecture diagrams, control descriptions, scan summaries, and known exceptions rather than describing them from memory.
  3. Check that confirmed findings have evidence and that unverified items are phrased as questions.
  4. Follow up with: “Turn the top five risks into tickets with acceptance criteria and a testable definition of done.”

Variations

Vendor assessment

Use this when assessing a software vendor before procurement or renewal.

Variation
Assess [VENDOR NAME] for use in [INTENDED USE]. Based only on [VENDOR EVIDENCE], create a vendor-security review table covering data handling, authentication, encryption, incident notification, subprocessors, business continuity, and contract gaps. Mark every item as verified, missing, or needs clarification. Score inherent and residual risk from 1-5, show the arithmetic, and draft the 10 most important questions for the vendor. Do not infer certifications or controls that are not documented.

Cloud review

Use this when you need a focused review of one cloud environment.

Variation
Create an AWS security-review runbook for [AWS ENVIRONMENT] using [KNOWN CONFIGURATION] and [DATA CLASSIFICATION]. Cover IAM, root-account controls, network exposure, encryption, logging, backups, secrets, container or serverless workloads, and account separation. For each check, state the console, CLI, or evidence source; the expected secure state; and the risk if it fails. Produce a findings template with likelihood × impact scoring. Flag checks that need read-only access or a qualified reviewer.

Incident readiness

Use this when preparing for a tabletop exercise or reviewing response readiness.

Variation
Design a security incident-response readiness assessment for [ORGANIZATION] and [TOP SCENARIOS], using [CURRENT PLAYBOOKS OR NOTES]. Produce a scenario-by-scenario table for detection, triage, containment, communications, legal/privacy escalation, recovery, and post-incident review. Identify missing decisions, contacts, evidence sources, and recovery time assumptions. Include a 90-minute tabletop agenda and five injects. Do not claim the organization can meet a recovery target unless the supplied evidence supports it.

Tips

  • Treat a security audit as an evidence-gathering exercise; a risk register can contain verification questions, but it should not turn unknowns into findings.
  • Keep likelihood and impact definitions written down before scoring so a score of 12 means the same thing across teams.
  • Include system owners and validation steps in remediation items; “enable MFA” is incomplete without the affected identities and proof of enforcement.
  • For internet-facing systems, have qualified testers validate exploitability and obtain authorization before running active scans or tests.

FAQ

Can Claude perform a security audit by itself?

It can organize evidence, identify likely gaps, and create an audit plan. It cannot verify live configurations, safely test systems, or certify compliance without authorized access and qualified review.

What should I give the AI besides an architecture diagram?

Include an asset list, data flows, identity-provider settings, cloud-account structure, recent scan or test results, policies, and known exceptions. State what is missing.

How should risk scores be used?

Use them to rank investigation and remediation, not as proof that a system is secure. Keep the likelihood and impact rationale next to each score.

Related prompts

All Finance, Accounting & Investing prompts →

Get a few prompts like this every week

Something Big is a free AI newsletter read by 50,000+ professionals. About three short emails a week with prompts and tools that work, plus what changed in AI and what to do about it.