Prompts / Operations & Project Management

ChatGPT prompt for a sprint planning process

This prompt creates a repeatable sprint-planning process that turns a prioritized backlog into a realistic commitment. Use it when planning meetings end with unclear scope, hidden dependencies, or overloaded teams.

PromptOpen ChatGPTOpen Claude
Act as an experienced agile delivery lead. Create a sprint-planning process for [TEAM AND PRODUCT]. Our sprint cadence and working arrangements are [CADENCE AND AVAILABILITY]. The upcoming backlog candidates are [BACKLOG ITEMS]. Use these delivery facts: [CAPACITY AND DELIVERY HISTORY]. Stakeholders, dependencies, and release constraints are [DEPENDENCIES AND CONSTRAINTS].

Produce a process for the next sprint in this exact format:
1. Pre-planning checklist, with a named owner and deadline for backlog ordering, acceptance criteria, estimates, design or technical readiness, dependency confirmation, and production-support capacity.
2. Capacity calculation: show available person-days or team capacity, planned leave, recurring work, support buffer, and the difference between capacity and forecast. Do not treat story points as hours.
3. Planning-meeting agenda, timeboxed for [MEETING LENGTH], including how the product owner states the outcome, how engineers surface unknowns, and how the team decides what is too large or risky to include.
4. Sprint goal and selected work: write one outcome-oriented sprint goal, a table of selected items with owner or owning pair, acceptance criteria, dependency, risk, and validation method, plus explicitly excluded work.
5. In-sprint controls: daily signal, mid-sprint scope-change rule, blocked-work escalation, and stakeholder update cadence.
6. End-of-sprint feedback inputs that should change the next planning session.

Do not assign people to work they did not agree to own, and do not conceal uncertainty behind precise estimates. Before answering, check that selected work fits stated capacity including buffer, and flag any backlog item lacking a testable acceptance criterion or unresolved dependency. Ask up to 3 clarifying questions only if a required input is missing.

Fill in

PlaceholderWhat to enterExample
[TEAM AND PRODUCT]Describe the team roles, product area, and what the team is accountable for delivering.Five-person product team for a B2B billing dashboard: product manager, designer, three engineers, and shared QA support.
[CADENCE AND AVAILABILITY]State sprint length, time zone or meeting constraints, holidays, leave, and regular ceremonies.Two-week sprints; planning is Monday at 10 a.m. ET; one engineer is out Thursday and Friday of week one.
[BACKLOG ITEMS]Paste the candidate work items with their purpose, estimates if known, and acceptance criteria.Invoice CSV export, 5 points, acceptance criteria drafted; tax-rate audit log, 8 points, needs legal wording; dashboard filter bug, 2 points; API rate-limit alerting, 3 points.
[CAPACITY AND DELIVERY HISTORY]Provide team availability, recent completed work, carryover, support load, and known reliability issues.Last three sprints completed 18, 15, and 17 points; about 20% of capacity goes to customer escalations; CSV export carried over once due to API ambiguity.
[DEPENDENCIES AND CONSTRAINTS]List external teams, approvals, release dates, technical dependencies, and non-negotiable commitments.Legal must approve audit-log labels; platform team will expose rate-limit events by Wednesday; customer demo is at the end of sprint.
[MEETING LENGTH]Enter the amount of time available for the planning meeting.75 minutes

How to use

  1. Paste backlog items as they actually stand, including vague or incomplete acceptance criteria.
  2. Include leave, incident duty, and recurring work before selecting feature work.
  3. Use the selected-work table as the meeting record and remove items whose dependencies are not ready.
  4. Follow up with: “Convert this plan into Jira-ready tickets and write a mid-sprint scope-change message for stakeholders.”

Variations

Backlog refinement

Use this before planning when work arrives too large or unclear.

Variation
Refine these backlog items for [PRODUCT AREA]: [RAW BACKLOG]. The user outcome and constraints are [OUTCOME AND CONSTRAINTS], and known technical dependencies are [DEPENDENCIES]. For each item, identify the user value, missing acceptance criteria, unknowns, dependencies, test approach, and whether it should be split. Propose vertical slices that can be demonstrated within [SPRINT LENGTH]. Do not estimate work that remains materially unclear. End with a ranked list of questions the product owner must answer before sprint planning.

Scope-change rule

Use this when urgent requests regularly disrupt active sprints.

Variation
Create a sprint scope-change policy for [TEAM]. Recent interruptions include [INTERRUPTION EXAMPLES], and our customer, compliance, and incident obligations are [OBLIGATIONS]. Define categories for emergency, fixed-date, and ordinary requests; who can authorize each; the evidence required; how equivalent work is removed or capacity added; stakeholder communication; and a log for retrospective review. Include a short decision tree. Do not call every executive request urgent or recommend bypassing security, testing, or release controls.

Planning facilitation

Use this to run a stronger planning meeting next week.

Variation
Write a facilitator script for a [MEETING LENGTH] sprint-planning meeting with [TEAM ROLES]. The candidate backlog is [BACKLOG], capacity facts are [CAPACITY], and tensions to resolve are [KNOWN ISSUES]. Give timed prompts for opening, sprint-goal discussion, capacity review, item selection, risk review, commitment, and close. Include exact questions that expose assumptions and dependencies without turning planning into solution design. End with the decisions and artifacts that must exist before the meeting can close.

Tips

  • Plan from available capacity after leave, support, ceremonies, and incident coverage, then compare the forecast with recent completed work.
  • A sprint goal describes a coherent outcome; a list of unrelated tickets makes tradeoffs difficult once new work arrives.
  • Require acceptance criteria that a tester, customer, or stakeholder could observe. “Improve performance” is not sufficient without a measurable condition.
  • Keep an explicit excluded-work list so stakeholders can see what was deferred instead of assuming everything discussed is committed.

FAQ

Should sprint planning assign every ticket to a person?

The team should agree clear ownership or an owning pair where that helps flow, but avoid treating assignment as a substitute for collaboration. Ownership must not override capacity or technical review.

How much work should a team plan?

Use recent delivery as a forecast, then reduce for known leave, support, and uncertainty. The goal is a credible forecast, not maximum utilization.

What if a critical request appears mid-sprint?

Apply a written urgency rule, make the tradeoff visible, and remove or defer equivalent work when capacity is fixed. Record it for the retrospective.

Related prompts

All Operations & Project Management prompts →

Get a few prompts like this every week

Something Big is a free AI newsletter read by 70,000+ professionals. About three short emails a week with prompts and tools that work, plus what changed in AI and what to do about it.