Help me write an academic paper as a transparent research and drafting assistant. The assignment is [ASSIGNMENT PROMPT AND RULES]. My working question or thesis is [RESEARCH QUESTION OR THESIS]. The sources I am allowed to use, with notes or excerpts, are [SOURCE NOTES]. My course level, citation style, and target length are [COURSE AND FORMAT]. My current outline or draft is [CURRENT WORK]. First, assess the assignment and return: (1) a one-sentence arguable thesis or 2–3 thesis options if mine is weak; (2) a detailed outline that assigns a claim, evidence, and reasoning function to each paragraph; and (3) a research-gap list that distinguishes “need a source,” “need to read more closely,” and “cannot support from supplied material.” Next, draft only the sections my notes can support, up to the target length. Use this structure: introduction with a specific problem and thesis; body paragraphs that make one claim, introduce evidence, analyze it, and connect back to the thesis; conclusion that states the implication without adding evidence. Cite sources in [COURSE AND FORMAT] only when enough bibliographic information is supplied. For every direct quotation, use only exact quoted text I gave you and include a source placeholder if page or location is absent. Never create citations, page numbers, data, study findings, quotations, or references. After the draft, add a claim-to-evidence audit table: claim, supporting supplied source, and missing information. Ask up to 3 clarifying questions only if a required input is missing. Before answering, self-check that each major claim has supplied evidence and flag wording that overstates causation, certainty, or source conclusions.
Fill in
| Placeholder | What to enter | Example |
|---|---|---|
| [ASSIGNMENT PROMPT AND RULES] | Enter the exact assignment question, allowed-source rules, and any AI-use policy. | History 201: argue how one New Deal program changed local government; use at least three assigned readings; 1,500–1,800 words; Chicago notes-bibliography; AI may assist with outlining and editing only |
| [RESEARCH QUESTION OR THESIS] | Enter your current question or proposed argument. | The Civilian Conservation Corps expanded local administrative capacity, but local control over site selection limited equal access |
| [SOURCE NOTES] | Enter citations plus your accurate notes, excerpts, and page numbers where available. | Smith, Parks and Policy, pp. 44–51: county boards selected many sites; Lee, CCC in the Midwest, p. 88: 1936 staffing data; course primary source, Ohio county minutes, May 1935: board requested two camps near flood-control work |
| [COURSE AND FORMAT] | Enter the course level, required citation style, and target word count. | Second-year undergraduate history; Chicago notes-bibliography; 1,500–1,800 words |
| [CURRENT WORK] | Enter any outline or draft you want the AI to build on or revise. | Intro and two body ideas: local staffing, then site selection; no conclusion drafted |
How to use
- Paste the exact assignment and your instructor’s AI policy before adding source notes.
- Supply page-level notes or excerpts; ask the AI to mark gaps rather than asking it to find support it has not seen.
- Compare the citation placeholders with the original texts and write the final notes and bibliography from verified details.
- Follow up with: “Revise paragraph 2 so the analysis does more work than the summary, using only the evidence already listed.”
Variations
Literature review
Use this when your assignment asks you to compare scholarly debates rather than make a single-source argument.
Plan a literature review of [TARGET LENGTH] for [ASSIGNMENT]. My sources and accurate notes are [SOURCE NOTES], and the required citation style is [CITATION STYLE]. Group sources by question, method, finding, and disagreement rather than summarizing one article at a time. Produce an outline, then a draft limited to claims supported by my notes. Do not invent consensus, quotations, page numbers, or citations. End with a matrix showing each source’s contribution and limitations; flag areas needing further reading.
Argument revision
Use this when you have a draft and need help strengthening analysis.
Revise this academic-paper draft: [DRAFT]. The assignment requirements are [RULES], and the source notes I can verify are [SOURCE NOTES]. Return a revision memo first: thesis problem, paragraphs that summarize instead of analyze, unsupported claims, and missing counterargument. Then provide a tracked-style rewrite using [BRACKETED ADDED TEXT] and [struck text explained in notes] only where the supplied sources support a change. Preserve my argument and voice; never add facts, citations, quotations, or page numbers.
Methods section
Use this for a paper that requires a transparent research design or methods section.
Draft a methods section of [WORD COUNT] for a study on [RESEARCH QUESTION]. My actual design, sample, measures, procedure, and limitations are [METHOD NOTES]. Follow [STYLE OR JOURNAL GUIDANCE]. Describe only work I performed or plan to perform; distinguish planned from completed work; do not report results, invent approvals, or claim causal inference beyond the design. Include a limitations paragraph and a checklist of missing methodological details that a reader would need to evaluate reproducibility.
Tips
- Treat AI-generated citations as placeholders until you confirm author names, dates, titles, page numbers, and the source actually supports the sentence.
- Build each body paragraph around a claim-evidence-analysis sequence; several quotations or summaries without analysis do not become an argument.
- Separate a source’s finding from your inference about it, especially when writing about causation, intent, or generalizability.
- If your course restricts generative AI, follow the policy and disclose assistance if required; do not use a prompt to bypass the rule.
FAQ
Can ChatGPT write my academic paper from sources?
It can help organize notes and develop source-grounded prose, but it can also produce plausible unsupported claims. You remain responsible for the research, interpretation, citations, and compliance with course policy.
How do I stop AI from making up citations?
Provide the sources yourself and require a claim-to-evidence audit. Verify every citation and quotation in the original source before submitting.
Can AI help with a thesis statement?
Yes. Give it the assignment, your evidence, and the scope; then choose a claim you can actually demonstrate with those sources.