ChatGPT prompt for writing a blog

Write a helpful blog post for a real reader searching this topic.

Primary keyword and likely search intent: [PRIMARY KEYWORD AND INTENT]
Reader, situation, and decision they need to make: [TARGET READER]
Topic scope and angle: [TOPIC AND ANGLE]
My source notes, expertise, links, or examples: [SOURCE MATERIAL]
Brand voice, product boundaries, and call to action: [VOICE AND CTA]

Start by stating the assumed search intent in one sentence and list the 5 to 8 questions the post must answer. If the intent or source support is unclear, ask up to three questions only where the answer changes the article.

Produce:
1. An SEO title under 60 characters, a meta description of 140 to 155 characters, and a concise URL slug.
2. A detailed outline with an H1, logical H2s, optional H3s, and a note beside each section explaining the reader question it answers. Do not create headings solely to repeat the keyword.
3. A complete 1,200 to 1,600 word draft. Open with the practical answer or framing, not a generic introduction. Use concrete steps, decision criteria, examples, caveats, and a short conclusion that matches the reader’s next action.
4. A source-and-claim table listing claims that need a citation, the supplied source that supports each claim, and claims to remove or soften because no source was supplied.
5. Three internal-link anchor-text suggestions, written as topics rather than invented URLs.

Use the primary keyword naturally in the title, opening, one relevant subheading, and where useful elsewhere. Include related terms only when they help explain the subject. Do not fabricate statistics, studies, quotes, testimonials, product capabilities, or first-hand experience. Do not copy or closely imitate source wording.

Before finalizing, check that the draft answers the stated intent before mentioning the CTA, and flag unsupported factual claims instead of presenting them as true.

Audit and refresh this blog post: [EXISTING DRAFT]. Its target keyword and intent are [KEYWORD AND INTENT]. Use these current approved sources: [SOURCE NOTES]. Identify missing reader questions, outdated or unsupported claims, thin sections, and headings that repeat rather than help. Then provide a revised outline and replacement copy for the sections that need it. Preserve accurate material where possible. Do not invent updated facts, statistics, links, or product changes; mark gaps for editorial research.

Draft a 1,000-word blog post from this expert interview or note set: [INTERVIEW NOTES]. The target keyword is [KEYWORD], and the intended reader is [READER]. Create an outline that organizes the expert’s advice into a clear decision process. Attribute statements only when the notes support attribution, preserve uncertainty, and distinguish opinion from factual claims. Include a title, meta description, and a list of follow-up questions for facts or examples missing from the notes. Do not manufacture quotes.

Write a fair comparison post for readers deciding between [OPTION A] and [OPTION B]. The target query is [TARGET QUERY], and the reader context is [READER CONTEXT]. Base the comparison only on [APPROVED FACTS AND SOURCES]. Use the same criteria for both options, explain where each is a better fit, include a comparison table, and state limitations. Do not declare a universal winner or invent features, prices, benchmarks, customer feedback, or integrations.